Head Covering and Government

<body topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 marginheight=0 marginwidth=0> <table cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0 border=0 height="100%"><tr> <td valign="top" width=168 BGCOLOR="#000000" TEXT="#F7F7FF" background="129a11c3.png"> <div> <A HREF="index.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Welcome to the Heart4God Website!"><U><B><IMG SRC="4b55a500.png" border=0 width="90" height="80" ALIGN="BOTTOM" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0"></B></U></A></div> <bR> <div> <A HREF="id2.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Writings of Joseph Herrin"><U><B>Writings by Date</B></U></A></div> <div> <A HREF="id212.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Writings of Joseph Herrin Organized "><U><B>Writings by Topic</B></U></A></div> <div> <A HREF="http://www.heart4god.ws/Audio/index.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="http://www.heart4god.ws/Audio/index.htm"><U><B>Audio Files</B></U></A></div> <div> <A HREF="id690.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Videos"><U><B>Videos</B></U></A></div> <div> <A HREF="id323.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Writings of Others"><U><B>Other Authors</B></U></A></div> <div> <A HREF="id324.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Links"><U><B>Links</B></U></A></div> <div> <A HREF="id339.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Questions and Answers"><U><B>Q&A</B></U></A></div> <bR> <div> <A HREF="id328.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Heart4God Email List"><U><B>Heart4God E-mail List</B></U></A></div> <div> <A HREF="http://www.parablesblog.blogspot.com" TARGET="_top" TITLE="http://www.parablesblog.blogspot.com"><U><B>Parables Blog</B></U></A></div> <bR> <div> <A HREF="id306.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="File Downloads"><U><B><IMG SRC="2b264140.png" border=0 width="100" height="20" ALIGN="BOTTOM" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0"></B></U></A></div> <bR> </td> <td valign="top" BGCOLOR="#000000" TEXT="#F7F7FF"> <bR> <div> <B>Head Covering and Government</B></div> <div> <IMG SRC="c2827160.png" border=0 width="807" height="22" ALIGN="BOTTOM" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0"></div> <bR> <div> Joseph Herrin (7-4-2001)</div> <bR> <bR> <div> This article was actually written as a letter to a sister who had some sincere questions about the issue of head covering, authority and submission. There are no deeper nor more profound truths to be found in the kingdom of God than those spoken of here. Many have failed to make progress in the kingdom of God because they have not discerned these truths, or they have simply refused to walk in them. In grasping these things and walking in them, the life of the saint will be profoundly altered, and they will be positioned in such a way before the Father that He can gladly promote them in His kingdom. May you have eyes to see and ears to hear as you read these words.</div> <bR> <div> Let me begin by sharing how the Father led me to a life changing understanding in 1993. From that date forward the course of my life has been altered as the revelations I gained have brought me both a tremendous peace born of understanding what Father requires of me, as well as bringing me into tremendous conflict with those who have not discerned these same things. Ultimately my ouster from my place of ministry in the church was precipitated because Father would not allow me to compromise the truths He had revealed to me, but this separation was also of the Father and He continues to use it in various and magnificent ways.</div> <bR> <div> I came to salvation in Yahshua when I was a child, being baptized at the age of ten. My upbringing was largely in Baptist churches, first in Oregon, and later in Georgia. I experienced a tremendous awakening to the things of God when I was in my mid to late teens, and I was very zealous for truth. I sought diligently to know the will of the Father and to walk in it. Often my zeal was not according to knowledge and I knew much personal failure and frustration as I sought to walk pleasing to God.</div> <bR> <div> I was from this time forward very active in the activities of the Christian church. I was in attendance every time the door was opened, and from my late teens I was involved in teaching Sunday School, participating in prayer meetings, and doing door-to-door visitation. This was an incredible thing, since I had grown up with a tremendous sense of inadequacy and low esteem. As a youth I would rarely look people in the eyes when I spoke to them due to my feelings of unworthiness and timidity. It was just an overwhelming desire to please the Father that led me to participate in things of which I was mortally terrified.</div> <bR> <div> I remember ministers goading people to participate in evangelism by quoting the scripture that says if we deny Christ, He will deny us. I was more afraid of God’s rejection of me than I was of my own tremendous fears and feelings of inadequacy in speaking to perfect strangers about Yahshua. My life was miserable for quite a period of time as I was torn between competing fears, and it seemed that fear was my chief motivation for some time.</div> <bR> <div> Gradually my fears of man and my feelings of inferiority lessened, yet my zeal for God went on unabated. I was involved in churches that often asked me to perform some service, and I was eager to do so. I was constantly searching the scriptures to see if I could discern the will of the Father for myself and for the churches of which I was a part. Often I would see things that would cause me to question why the church was doing certain things. As the churches I was in had an open door policy when the elders were meeting, I would often attend and ask them why we were doing some particular thing. I must have been a source of irritation to many men who were simply set on doing things because it was a tradition handed down by men.</div> <bR> <div> Sometimes my questioning would lead to difficulties, particularly if I was convinced that the practice of the church was in opposition to the teaching of scriptures and I could discern that our traditions were having a negative impact in the lives of people. I never could understand the mindset of people who did things because it was the way Baptists, or some other group, did it. My sole authority was the word of God and the revelation of the Spirit.</div> <bR> <div> To give you one example, in my early twenties I was given the position of Sunday School Superintendent at one Baptist church I was attending. This was quite a responsible position for one my age, but due to my zeal I was as Paul, “advancing beyond many of my contemporaries.” At the time the Sunday School program had no oversight and was a real mishmash of uncoordinated activities of differing individuals. I began to diligently look into this issue and to know how to improve it.</div> <bR> <div> I looked at the overall objective of Sunday School, which I discerned was to make disciples of Christ, and I looked to how we could better accomplish this. I read books on the principles of teaching. I addressed issues of a lack of coordination between classes. I wanted to design a progressive Sunday School where consistent and systematic growth in the teachings of Christ would be attained. After spending considerable time looking into these things I wrote a paper to share with the church elders, listing my recommendations. Right as I was about to seek an opportunity to share these things with the elders, Father spoke to me.</div> <bR> <div> Father asked me again what the goal of Sunday School was, and I answered that it was to take children and to make disciples of Christ out of them. He then asked me to whom He gave that responsibility in scriptures. As I contemplated this I had to answer that it was to the parents that He gave this charge. He showed me multiple scriptures where He gave the charge to parents to train up their children and to teach them the ways of Yahweh.</div> <bR> <div> Father began speaking to me of how Sunday School started out as an outreach to street children and orphans, and later it began to include children whose parents were in the church. I was reminded of something Bill Gothard had shared during a Basic Youth Conflicts seminar. He said, “Once men begin to share a God given responsibility, it is not long before they abandon that responsibility altogether.” I saw how this had happened in the church.</div> <bR> <div> It used to be common practice for families to sit down together and for the parents to teach the scriptures to their children. When the church began to share this responsibility, it wasn’t long before parents began to rely solely upon the churches instruction of their children, and they ceased to instruct them.</div> <bR> <div> Father then revealed to me some other tragic results. He told me that when He gives someone a responsibility, He also gives them the authority to carry it out. Because the church was not given the responsibility to train up children, they lacked the authority to achieve lasting results. They were endeavoring to do something without the authority to carry it out. He further showed me that with responsibility goes honor. When parents train their children they receive the honor that goes with their position of instruction. When they give away the responsibility they also give away the honor that attends it. The children instead give the honor to their teachers, and in times of conflict between a parent’s advice and a teacher’s, the child will often side with the teacher for they honor them more in the realm of instruction and insight than they do their own parents.</div> <bR> <div> As Father began to show me all of these things I was appalled. I saw how the church had developed a tradition that began with good intent, and how it had developed into something that had far reaching negative repercussions in the body of Christ. Many of the parents in the church I was in spent no time at all instructing their children. The results were very evident.</div> <bR> <div> As the Father finished speaking to me of these things I had to tear up the paper I had formerly prepared and write a new paper. Whereas I was confident the church leadership would have received the first paper well, I was very guarded in my optimism of how they would receive the revelations Father had given me. I knew that, although the elders of this church said they wanted to be a New Testament body of believers, they actually only wanted to do so in so far as they did not have to give up any traditions that they found to be to their liking.</div> <bR> <div> I shared my findings with the church leadership, and it was totally rejected. I shared with the elders that according to scripture, the chief focus of the church in making disciples of its children should be in encouraging, equipping, and empowering parents to fulfill their divinely given responsibilities. I shared with them that this is where the efforts of leadership should be focused, and that the Sunday School should be phased out, as it existed in its current forms.</div> <bR> <div> Everything I shared was resolutely rejected. I had some elders tell me that all we needed was to love Yahshua and share His love with others, and these other issues were inconsequential. Some just refused to even consider that such a sacred cow as Sunday School should actually be done away with. My tenure as Sunday School Superintendent was very short lived, and the bad fruit of our traditions was seen in the breakdowns in the families of the church.</div> <bR> <div> This is but one example of a conflict I found myself in due to my zeal to walk in the revealed truths of God. There were many others and I would have earned frequent flyer miles for attending elders’ meetings, if there were such a thing. In none of my efforts, however, did I ever see the leadership of the church change in even the least way. I became a pariah to different congregations and I found myself leaving more than one body frustrated and disillusioned.</div> <bR> <div> When I experienced these separations I was very torn. I had a zeal to walk in truth and it grieved me when churches chose tradition or their own ways over the ways of Yahweh. Yet something was nagging at the back of my mind that these separations could be handled differently, yet I had no clue as to how. I was often reflecting on Yahshua’s high priestly prayer recorded in John 17 where He prayed that we would be one, even as He and the Father were one. Yet I could not reconcile my zeal for truth and this oneness.</div> <bR> <div> I continued in this state for about a whole decade, and my frustration grew. When I was in my early thirties, and married, I once more found myself in a situation where I was very active in a body, and I was discerning some grave errors that the leadership was making. My wife became caught up in it this time for a couple she was very close to were being badly treated by the Pastor of this church. They were the music ministers of this body and they lived in a house the church owned. The pastor had aspirations to start a counseling ministry and he considered that their home would be the ideal location, precipitating this couple being run off so their house would be vacated. (Of course, it wasn’t as simple as this, and there were faults on many sides.)</div> <bR> <div> My wife became so distraught that she no longer wanted to attend this church. My own words to the elders and pastor were rejected and I too was not entirely desirous to stay. I asked permission to leave so that my wife and I could get some emotional distance and better hear from the Father. We were given permission, yet in my heart I neither had peace about staying or leaving. My wife and I ended up leaving for a period of six months, and during this time in 1993 the Father revealed some profound things to me that have changed the course of my life.</div> <bR> <div> During this time of separation from the body a brother gave me a copy of Watchman Nee’s book “Spiritual Authority.” Little did this brother realize how profound an impact that book would have on my life. As I read the book the Spirit quickened passage after passage and I began to see scriptures fall into place like dominoes falling in a long chain. I knew that something critical that I had been missing was being revealed to me, and that the Father had waited until I was so conflicted and hungry for understanding that I would receive what He wanted to show me. Happily I received His instruction and correction.</div> <bR> <div> Watchman Nee states, “Authority is a tremendous thing in the universe - nothing overshadows it. It is therefore imperative for us who desire to serve God to know the authority of God.” He further states, “To offend God’s authority is a rebellion far more serious than that of offending God’s holiness. Since it is a matter of conduct, sinning is more easily forgiven than rebellion, the latter being a matter of principle. Satan’s intent od setting his throne above the throne of God was the thing that violated God’s authority; it was the principle of self-exaltation... In serving God we must not violate authorities, because to do so is a principle of Satan. How can we preach Christ according to Satan’s principle? <FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#FF0000" FACE="Georgia" >Yet it is possible in our work to stand with Christ in doctrine, while at the same time stand with Satan in principle.”</FONT></div> <bR> <div> This is exactly what the Father showed me that I had been doing. In my zeal for the truth I had been standing with Christ in doctrine. I loved the truths Father was revealing to me. I desired to see them walked in. I desired to see error eschewed. I longed for the benefits of seeing the children of God walking in the truth. Yet Father showed me that my approach of contending with the church authorities over these issues of doctrine was in actuality practicing the principle of Satan, which is rebellion.</div> <bR> <div> How my eyes were opened when I saw this. I understood that as it says in Romans 13, “Let every soul be in subjection to the higher powers: for there is no power but of God; and the powers that be are ordained of God. Therefore he that resists the power, withstands the ordinance of God: and they that withstand shall receive judgment to themselves.... Wherefore ye must needs be in subjection, not only because of wrath, but also for conscience’ sake.”</div> <bR> <div> As I read through this book, and as I studied the scriptures, I found the principles of God’s authority and our right response to all authorities, including those in the church. God never honors rebellion in any form. Rebellion is the principle of Satan. Submission is the perfect principle of Christ. Even when people are under ungodly authorities, the Father never honors those who lift their hands, or wag their tongues against those authorities. David is a case in point.</div> <bR> <div> David was subject to the ungodly authority of King Saul. David was completely faithful in the discharge of his duties, and he never failed in loyalty to Saul. Even when Saul sought repeatedly to kill David, and when Saul killed the priests of God, David refused to lift a finger against him. David was presented opportunities to strike Saul, even when Saul was in the process of seeking to take David’s life. Yet David said, “Who can lift his hand against God’s anointed and remain guiltless?”</div> <bR> <div> When David had opportunity to slay Saul in the cave, he instead merely cut off the corner of Saul’s garment. Yet even for this small act we are told that David’s heart smote him” and he repented of it. Watchman Nee says that cutting off the corner of the garment may not be as serious as murdering someone, but in the church it can be equated to murmuring against an authority, or speaking against them to others. Our hearts should convict us in these matters.</div> <bR> <div> David always sought to cover the transgressions of Saul. He even wept for him, and sang a song eulogizing him when he heard he had been slain. When others thought they would win David’s favor by stating that they had been instrumental in Saul’s death, David had them put to death, being condemned by their own words.</div> <bR> <div> Another example of covering the sins of one in authority is when Noah became drunk and fell asleep while naked in his tent. His son Ham failed to see the dignity of the authority of his father and he went out and reported his fathers ugliness to his brothers. “When Ham  saw his father’s improper conduct he did not have the slightest sense of shame or sorrow, nor did he try to cover his father’s fault. This reveals that he had a rebellious spirit.” Shem and Japheth, however, managed the situation quite differently. They entered the tent backwards - thus avoiding seeing their father’s nakedness - and they covered their father with a garment they had laid on their shoulders.</div> <bR> <div> We are told by Paul that “love covers a multitude of sins.” Yet how common it is to revile those in positions of authority when we see them in error. We should be grieved for them, and we should seek to cover their transgressions and to ask the Father to restore them to righteousness.</div> <bR> <div> My own error was not so much being a spreader of slander or gossip, nor being a malcontent seeking to expose the sins of another. My failure was in not seeing how the Father would have us to address the situation of seeing a leader in sin. My response had been to consistently go to them and to tell them of their error. The Father spoke strongly to me and showed me that my proper response was found in trusting Him to deal with a wrong authority. The testimony of all of scripture is that Yahweh will vindicate Himself. He both establishes authorities, and He disciplines and even removes authorities that sin against Him. He does not ask for those under authority to correct those over them, for this leads to rebellion.</div> <bR> <div> Father particularly gave me the following passage as my pattern.</div> <bR> <div> I Peter 2:18-3:2</div> <div> 18     Servants, be submissive to your masters with all respect, not only to those who are good and gentle, but also to those who are unreasonable.</div> <div> 19     For this finds favor, if for the sake of conscience toward God a man bears up under sorrows when suffering unjustly.</div> <div> 20     For what credit is there if, when you sin and are harshly treated, you endure it with patience? But if when you do what is right and suffer for it you patiently endure it, this finds favor with God.</div> <div> 1     In the same way, you wives, be submissive to your own husbands so that even if any of them are disobedient to the word, they may be won without a word by the behavior of their wives,</div> <div> 2     as they observe your chaste and respectful behavior.</div> <div> (NAS)</div> <bR> <div> Father told me that as I had no place of authority yet in the church, I was to be as the wife of which Peter spoke. I was to be submissive to those over me in authority, and when the occasion came that I found them to be in sin, I was to let them be won without a word, with my behavior remaining respectful and chaste.</div> <bR> <div> The principle is this; if a woman has a husband who is disobedient to the word of God then she has two options. She can correct him herself, telling him of his transgression, and possibly persisting in speaking of it to him until she sees a change. If she chooses this course then Father will remove His hand from the husband and He will delay in correcting him for there is rebellion in the house. However, of the woman understands that Yahweh will correct those whom He places in positions of authority, and if she will refrain from speaking to the husband and correcting him; if she will instead trust that God will correct him, then Yahweh will act decidedly to bring correction to the husband. This latter course is the only way to maintain peace in the household when the husband is in sin and the wife discerns it. For her to put out her hand to bring correction will loose striving and conflict in the household.</div> <bR> <div> Father showed me that this same principle is at work in the body of Christ. When I would discern that there was error in leadership, it had been my habit to tell them of their error. I would stretch out my hand to offer correction. I was not malicious in this, but the principle I was following was wrong. Authority must ever be corrected from above, not from those beneath them. Father showed me clearly the course set before me. He told me to go back to the church I had left and to apologize to those in leadership for my actions, even though they were still in sin. He told me to offer no correction to them, nor to even open my mouth regarding anything they were doing. I was to say nothing good or bad. I was to entrust Father to deal with the wrong authority.</div> <bR> <div> Yahweh assured me that if He found one so submitted in this way that He would assuredly deal with the wrong authority. He revealed to me that the reason there was so much wrong and sinful authority in the body was that He could find no one under these authorities who was truly submitted. Because there was rebellion in the house He delayed to correct the wrong authorities. Churches are full of rebellion. The members of the body are constantly going around and speaking words against leadership. Some are actively rebelling and calling for removal of sinful ministers. Others seek to split congregations, being factious and submissive to no one. It is the rarest of saints that looks to God to correct a wrong authority. Like Ham, the churches broadcast the nakedness and shame of those in authority over them.</div> <bR> <div> Father spoke to me and said that if He could find a person in submission, and bearing up courageously under a wrong authority, that He would move heaven and earth on their behalf. He would correct the wrong authority and restore godly leadership.</div> <bR> <div> In my own situation, I went back with my wife and met with the pastor. I shared with him what the Father had revealed to me, and how I had been thinking I was advocating the doctrines of Christ, yet I had been practicing the principle of Satan which is rebellion. This pastor graciously forgave me and then told me that if I wanted to share anything with the body on Sunday regarding this, that I could.</div> <bR> <div> Sunday came and I was given the opportunity to address the whole body. I shared the same with them, confessing that I had been practicing the principle of rebellion when I thought myself in agreement with the purposes of Christ. I was given great grace to share, feeling no embarrassment, being greatly aided by the Spirit, and the people were visibly moved.</div> <bR> <div> Father honored my attitude of submission, and this pastor who was in sin and who had been at this church for 14 years, suddenly resigned. Thus Father removed the wrong authority because He had found one who would look to Him to correct the one He had placed in authority.</div> <bR> <div> For another three years Father told me to walk in the place of the submissive wife and to not open my mouth saying anything good or bad to the church elders. He told me I was to pray for them. For three years I did not attend a single elders’ meeting. I prayed for these men and for the body.</div> <bR> <div> At first I was still focused on the sins of those in leadership, and they were not walking by faith, nor by the leading of the Spirit. I prayed that God would fix them or remove them that the body would not be hindered. Father stopped me abruptly, however. He said, “If you are going to pray for these men as I asked you to, then you must pray according to how I would have you to do so.” He then asked me, “Do you know how long I have longed to correct some things in your life? By the judgment that you judge others, you shall be judged.”</div> <bR> <div> Needless to say, my prayers changed immediately. I began to pray, “Father, have mercy on these men. Father, be patient with these men. Father be gentle in your correction of them. Take all the time You need to bring them to obedience and righteousness.” My own calling to intercessory prayer took off at this point and what had once been a labor became a passion. I began to pray that Father would give me His heart to pray for others. I asked that I would know His heart and feel His emotion for those I prayed for. I longed for these times of prayer before the Father. I relished these times. They were the highlights of my life.</div> <bR> <div> Immediately after Father gave me this understanding of authority, the gift of writing that had lain dormant came alive within me. For years I knew I had a calling to write, yet I was able to bring nothing forth. I attempted to do so many times, and I would write pages and pages. At the end, however, I would read what I had written and I sensed no anointing upon the words. I would end up trashing what I had labored on.</div> <bR> <div> Immediately after I came rightly under authority, Father opened up this area of my life. I sat down to write a piece of correspondence to a minister of another church who had counseled me during my time of separation, and as I wrote out flowed an article that I had not even intended to write. This article is the very earliest writing on my website. It is an article entitled, “The Work that Refreshes.” The writing had an anointing on it and it was widely distributed among many churches at the time.</div> <bR> <div> Father gave me understanding of this. He told me that He could not advance anyone in the kingdom who did not know and practice His principles of government and submission to authority. Once I learned these things and began to walk in them He was able to bring me into my calling.</div> <bR> <div> I cannot stress how vital this topic is. Let me share a few more words from Watchman Nee’s book.</div> <bR> <div> Please take note that Satan is not afraid of our preaching the word of Christ, yet how very much in fear he is of our being subject to the authority of Christ. Never should we who serve God serve according to the principle of Satan.</div> <bR> <div> We preach the gospel in order to bring men into God’s authority, but how can we establish God’s authority on earth if we have not met [understood] authority?</div> <bR> <div> The controversy of the universe is centered on who shall have the authority, and our conflict with Satan is the direct result of our attributing authority to God.</div> <bR> <div> [When we look at men] let us not see the man, but only the authority vested in him. We do not obey man, but God’s authority in man... We are on the wrong road if we meet man first before we obey authority. The opposite is the right way. Then we will not mind who the man is.</div> <bR> <div> The greatest of God’s demands on man is not for him to bear the cross, to serve, to make offerings, or deny himself. The greatest demand is for him to obey... Why did Samuel say, “obedience is better than sacrifice”? Because even in sacrifice there can be the element of self-will. Obedience alone is absolutely honoring to God, for it alone takes God’s will as its center.</div> <bR> <div> For authority to be expressed there must be subjection. If there is to be subjection, self needs to be excluded; but according to one’s self-life, subjection is impossible. This is only possible when one lives in the Spirit. It is the highest expression of God’s will.</div> <bR> <div> To serve God we are not called to choose self-denial or sacrifice, rather are we called to fulfill God’s purpose. The basic principle is not to choose the cross, but to obey God’s will. Should the principle on which we work and serve include rebellion, then Satan will obtain and enjoy glory even through our sacrifices.</div> <bR> <div> As God’s servants, the first thing we should meet is authority. To touch authority is as practical as touching salvation, but it is a deeper lesson. Before we can work for God we must be overturned by His authority. Our entire relationship with God is regulated by whether or not we have met authority. If we have then we shall encounter authority everywhere.</div> <bR> <div> In Matthew 7:21-23 we find our Lord reprimanding those who prophesy and cast out demons and do many mighty things in His name. Why are they disapproved? Because they make self their starting point; they themselves do things in the name of the Lord. This is the activity of the flesh. Wherefore our Lord pronounces them evildoers instead of His laborers. He emphasizes that only the person who does the will of His Father shall enter the kingdom of he heavens. This alone is work in obedience to God’s will, that which originates in Him. We are not to find work to do, rather we are to be sent to work by God. Once having understood this we shall truly experience the reality of the authority of the kingdom of the heavens.</div> <bR> <div> This issue of authority and submission is such a vital element and the church has largely neglected it. We would be amazed to see that the vast majority of what is happening in the renewal movement today does not find its origin in the will of God. How many saints are running to this meeting and that meeting because they see miraculous things happening and they mistakenly view these occurrences as evidence of Yahweh’s stamp of approval upon some man or group? Yahshua said that “Many will come in that day”; they will confess that they did miracles in His name, they prophesied in His name, they cast out demons in His name, and He will tell them, “Depart from me you workers of iniquity.”</div> <bR> <div> I am convinced that we are seeing the fulfillment of this prophecy in this very hour. Many are running to and fro after meetings and miracles, not discerning that they are works that have not originated in the will of the Father. Many are taking the gifts of the Spirit and using them as their own minds direct them. They are increasing themselves in substance and reputation, and the blind masses are only to happy to follow after them.</div> <bR> <div> I do not say that those doing these things are doing them by Beelzebub, as the Jewish leaders falsely accused Yahshua. Indeed, the Spirit is present in these things, yet those so walking in these things have by and large neglected to walk as Yahshua who said that He never did anything of His own initiative. He only did the will of the Father. He further said that He never spoke a word of His own initiative, He only spoke the words the Father had given to Him to speak.</div> <bR> <div> The renewal movement is full to the brim with licentiousness. Men and women are running to and from according to their own understanding and they are performing every work to which their minds lead them. The saints of Yahweh should not do so. We are to be led by the Spirit of God in all things. As Romans 8:14 says, “Those who are being led by the Spirit of God are [mature] sons of God.” There is much immaturity and fleshliness in the body of Christ.</div> <bR> <div> How sobering is the story of Nadab and Abihu! They served as priests, yet not because they were personally right, but because they belonged to the family which God had chosen. God had set Aaron to be priest and the anointing oil was poured upon his head. In all matters of service Aaron was chief; his sons were mere helpers, serving beside the altar in obedience to Aaron. God never meant to let the sons of Aaron serve independently; He placed them under the authority of Aaron... If Aaron made no move, his sons also ought not to move. Everything began with Aaron, not his sons. Were the sons to venture to offer sacrifices by themselves, they would be offering strange fire. This was  exactly what Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, did. They thought they could offer sacrifices by themselves and so they offered without Aaron’s order. The meaning of strange fire is to serve without an order, to serve without obedience to authority. They had watched their father offer, and to them it was rather simple. And so they assumed they could do the same thing. Nadab and Abihu only thought of whether they were able to do the same.</div> <bR> <div> Here we face a most serious problem: serving God and offering strange fire seem to be very much alike, and yet they are worlds apart. True service is initiated by God. When man serves under God’s authority, he is thereby accepted. Strange fire originates from man. It does not require knowing the will of God or obeying the authority of God. It is wholly done through man’s own zeal and it ends up in death.</div> <div> (Spiritual Authority, Watchman Nee)</div> <bR> <div> I would estimate that more than 90 percent of that which passes for the work of God today is actually strange fire originating in the mind of man. Many of those in the renewal only consider what they can do, they do not concern themselves with the will of God. Yahshua could have healed many more people than He did. He could have spoken to problems in government. He could have fed many more people and eliminated poverty and hunger. He could have turned the stones into bread when He was hungry. He could have done all of this and much more. How many saints today are doing things simply because they can, not discerning if it is the will of the Father or not? Many will hear the words, “Depart from Me you workers of iniquity.”</div> <bR> <div> Did you catch Watchman Nee’s words earlier? He said that it is possible to offer sacrifices to God, it is possible to preach the gospel, it is possible to perform miracles, and in doing all of these things to bring glory to Satan. The only requirement is that we have not submitted to the will of the Father in these things. Satan does not fear the active saint who is doing great exploits in the name of Yahshua. He fears the one who is submitted to the authority of Yahshua.</div> <bR> <div> This is indeed the greatest and deepest principle in the kingdom of God. Deeper even than salvation. Truly, a person can be saved and still fail to walk under the authority of God, failing to recognize authority in the places Father has delegated it to man. The issue of covering is central to this issue.</div> <bR> <div> I think at times that Western men and women are at a disadvantage when it comes to understanding issues of government, authority and submission. We have been altogether steeped in democracy which turns the whole pattern of divine government on its head. In the kingdom of God all authority flows from God down to those whom He entrusts it to. In democracy, authority is determined by the people as they choose through election who the authorities will be over them. In the kingdom of God, all authority is established by God. In democracy it is “of the people, by the people, for the people.”</div> <bR> <div> We know little of submission in our Western society. In our government we can impeach, or recall a leader whom we do not like. In most of our churches we can do the same thing. In marriages it has become all to common to divorce a spouse that is viewed as unreasonable or hard to live with. On our jobs we have many different paths to go over a boss’ head if we don’t like the things they are doing. In the church, if people don’t like a particular minister they are free to go church hopping, looking for the one that is appealing to them. There is very little submission practiced.</div> <bR> <div> In some ways Eastern cultures have an advantage in discerning issues of government and authority. Israel is considered an Oriental culture, and Watchman Nee also being from the Orient has an advantage in discerning Paul’s instructions. However, it is not to his culture that he always relates back, but to the testimony of the scriptures themselves, and the witness of the Spirit of God. I hope you will take a good look at the following section for there is great insight to be gained from it.</div> <bR> <div> [Excerpt from “Love One Another”, chapter “Head Covering”, Watchman Nee]</div> <bR> <div> I Corinthians 11:2-16</div> <div> 2     Now I praise you because you remember me in everything, and hold firmly to the traditions, just as I delivered them to you.</div> <div> 3     But I want you to understand that Christ is the head of every man, and the man is the head of a woman, and God is the head of Christ.</div> <div> 4     Every man who has something on his head while praying or prophesying, disgraces his head.</div> <div> 5     But every woman who has her head uncovered while praying or prophesying, disgraces her head; for she is one and the same with her whose head is shaved.</div> <div> 6     For if a woman does not cover her head, let her also have her hair cut off; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, let her cover her head.</div> <div> 7     For a man ought not to have his head covered, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man.</div> <div> 8     For man does not originate from woman, but woman from man;</div> <div> 9     for indeed man was not created for the woman's sake, but woman for the man's sake.</div> <div> 10     Therefore the woman ought to have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels.</div> <div> 11     However, in the Lord, neither is woman independent of man, nor is man independent of woman.</div> <div> 12     For as the woman originates from the man, so also the man has his birth through the woman; and all things originate from God.</div> <div> 13     Judge for yourselves: is it proper for a woman to pray to God with head uncovered?</div> <div> 14     Does not even nature itself teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him,</div> <div> 15     but if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her? For her hair is given to her for a covering.</div> <div> 16     But if one is inclined to be contentious, we have no other practice, nor have the churches of God.</div> <div> (NAS)</div> <bR> <div> We are going to consider the important subject of covering the head.</div> <bR> <div> In I Corinthians 11:2-16, the word “brother” or “sister” is never used. Rather, the subject, head covering, is related to “man” or “woman.” Hence, what we have here does not touch upon our position in Christ, but on God’s order in creation.</div> <bR> <div> Moreover, this same passage does not assert that “I and the Father are One” (John 10:30); it simply declares that “the head of Christ is God” (v.3). So the relationship here described is not that of Father and Son, but that of God and Christ, of God and His Anointed One. It does not deal with those things which happened in the godhead between God the Father and God the Son. Instead, it refers to the relationship of God with the Christ of God, Him who was sent and anointed by God. Head covering has nothing to do with the godhead; it is related exclusively to the relationship between God and His Anointed. Further, head covering here is not considered as between Christ and His church. It is not because Christ is the head of the church and the church is the body of Christ that there must be a head covering. No, this is not the fact here. What is said here is, “the head of every man is Christ” (v.3). Though there are many people, Christ is the head to everyone.  The headship here does not refer to the church; rather, it shows that Christ is the head to each man. So the relationship defined here points not to Christ and the church, but to Christ and every man. It does not deal with the relationship among God’s children, between brothers and sisters; it does not tell what brothers and sisters in the church must do. It merely says that “the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man.” This relationship must be understood before we can know what head covering is.</div> <bR> <DIV ALIGN="LEFT"></DIV> <div> God’s Two Universal Systems</div> <bR> <div> I would like to view this matter of head covering from far off; otherwise, it will not be easy to understand I Corinthians 11. To comprehend this chapter requires that we know God and His Word. First of all we need to know that God has set up two systems in the universe: the system of grace and the system of government.</div> <bR> <div> 1. The System of Grace</div> <bR> <div> All that concerns the church, salvation, brothers and sisters, and God’s children is included in God’s systems of grace. Everything which pertains to the Holy Spirit and to redemption belongs to the system of grace. Within the proceedings of grace, the relationship of man and woman is such that the Syro-Phoenician woman received grace from God as much as the centurion. So did Mary as much as Peter. So, too, might Martha and Mary have been raised from the dead as well as Lazarus.</div> <bR> <div> 2. The System of Government</div> <bR> <div> But there is another system in the Bible which we will call the government of God. This system is entirely different from that of grace. God’s government is an independent system under which God does whatever pleases Him.</div> <bR> <div> When God created man, He created male and female. This belongs to God’s government. He created male first and female next - also a matter of His government. He does what pleases Him. He has a sovereign and independent will. When He decided that the Lord Yahshua should be the seed of the woman, this too was God’s government. He does not take man into His counsel.</div> <bR> <div> In the Garden of Eden, God gave fruit to man for food. This was God’s government; He did as He pleased. After the flood, God gave the flesh of animals to men as food. It also was a governmental act.</div> <bR> <div> In the beginning men spoke the same language. But then men joined together to build the tower of Babel in defiance of God. As a result, their tongues were confused so that they could no longer understand one another. This is God’s governmental hand upon men. Afterward, during the time of Pentecost, God poured out His Spirit and caused people to speak in tongues. This also was the governmental hand of God.</div> <bR> <div> After the tower of Babel, God scattered the people over all the earth. They became many races. This was the result of God’s government. From these many races, God chose a people that dwelt alone, the race of Israel, to belong to Him - and this is grace. But to divide the people into races is government.</div> <bR> <div> After a while, these races became many kingdoms. According to Biblical history, kingdoms began later than races. First the races, and then the nations. Each kingdom had a king over its people. This also was permitted in God’s ordering.</div> <bR> <div> During the time of the judges the Israelites were only a race, not a kingdom. Even during Samuel’s time they were still a race like other races, for they did not yet have a king to reign over them. But one day the people of Israel asked for a king, as the other nations had. In choosing this way, they brought themselves out of grace and under government. They said, “Now make us a king to judge us like all the nations” (I Samuel 8:5). God answered them through Samuel, saying, “Now therefore hearken unto their voice: howbeit thou shalt solemnly protest unto them, and thou shalt show them the manner of the king that shall reign over them” (v.9).</div> <bR> <div> So, God chose Saul to be their king. As soon as Saul was chosen, God’s governmental system commenced in Israel. This does not mean that God’s grace no longer existed, but it does indicate that the Israelites had put themselves irrevocably under government. Thereafter, they were not free to resist their anointed because he was their king. Although later on, as pertaining to grace, Saul left God, he nonetheless was still king according to government. If we trace these two different courses, we shall see two different situations. According to grace Saul failed, but according to government he was still king. Thus it was that David could not resist God’s established authority.</div> <bR> <div> Grace and Government Joined and Completed</div> <bR> <div> These two systems of grace and government continued side by side until the coming of the Lord Yahshua. Quite evidently there are two sides to God’s work: the system of God’s grace and the system of God’s providence proceed together in the world. The priests and the prophets stand on the side of grace, maintaining the system of grace; the kings and the leaders of Israel stand on the side of God’s government, maintaining the system of His government.</div> <bR> <div> When the Lord Yahshua was on earth, on the one hand He came to be the savior of the world, to deliver men from sin. This is according to the system of grace. On the other hand, God sent Him to the world that through the work of the cross He might establish His own authority and set up His kingdom so that the heavens might rule on the earth. This is the system of government. Its work will continue until the power of the devil is destroyed and the kingdom and the new heaven and the new earth are brought in. On that day, the two systems of grace and government will be joined into one. That is to say, that during the time of the new heavens and the new earth, these two systems will become one in the Lord Yahshua. He does both sides of God’s work. He works under the system of government as well as the system of grace.</div> <div> The government of God does not commence with the creation of man, but, rather, at the creation of the angels. This is quite clear in the Bible. When Satan was yet a morning star, while he was still ruling, God’s governmental system had already begun. Following the creation of man, basic institutions such as marriage, husband and wife, family, and the relationship between parents and children all came within the realm of God’s government.</div> <bR> <div> The basic lesson that all brothers and sisters need to learn is that we should never allow grace to interfere with God’s government. I say most emphatically that never in our lives should we permit grace to intervene in what God has decided in government.<FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#FFFFCC" FACE="Georgia" > </FONT>God wants men to respect His government not to overthrow it. <FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#FFFFCC" FACE="Georgia" >If we are ignorant of God’s government, we are lawless people in the sight of God. Since we have never seen the kingdom except as it is seen in the church, it is imperative for us to see the system of government. </FONT>As a matter of fact, the system of grace is for the sake of completing the system of government. The system of government is not for the system of grace, but grace is for the completion of government.</div> <bR> <div> Many hold to a fundamental error: they foolishly maintain that grace can set aside government. The truth is that what God does in grace never alters God’s government. The forgiveness of grace that we receive from God does not change His governmental forgiveness. No matter how much we receive forgiveness in grace, still it does not affect governmental forgiveness.</div> <bR> <div> God’s government is an independent principle. From beginning to end, God brings in His governmental system. Grace only complements government. The system of grace was added because of man’s insubordination and rebellion under the system of government. Grace is for the purpose of redeeming and restoring those who are insubordinate and rebellious, so that they may be subject to God’s governmental system. Hence, grace actually gives an assist to God’s system of government.</div> <bR> <div> Examples of God’s Government</div> <bR> <div> 1. Adam</div> <bR> <div> You remember the tragic story of Adam’s fall. After God created Adam, He planted a garden and put man in charge of it. God literally gave this garden to Adam and Eve. “Eden” means pleasure. So this first couple lived in a garden of pleasure. Then they sinned against God. Even though God gave them a promise of redemption, saying that a savior would come as the seed of the woman, yet He drove them out of the Garden of Eden. It is God’s grace to save, but that did not change God’s government in driving them out.</div> <bR> <div> Not only was Adam thrown out of Eden, but also God set Cherubim to guard the Garden so that Adam could not enter again. This too is God’s government. Thus we can see that God’s grace and God’s government are two separate matters. Grace gives man the promise of a savior, but God’s government drives that same man out of the Garden of Eden.</div> <bR> <div> 2. The Israelites</div> <bR> <div> Having arrived at Kadesh Barnea, the Israelites refused to enter into Canaan; consequently, God denied them that privilege. Though they repented and then tried to enter, many of them were killed by the Canaanites, for God had barred the way. Their cries did not change God’s decision (Numbers 13 and 14). God has His governmental act; He will not allow men to interfere with His government.</div> <bR> <div> 3. Moses</div> <bR> <div> Moses did not sanctify the Lord before the eyes of the people when he smote the rock twice; as a consequence he could not enter into Canaan (Numbers 20:7-12). Though God had mercy on him by bringing him to the top of Mount Pisgah, He did not allow him to enter Canaan with his people. Moses could view the land with God on Pisgah, but he could not enter in (see Deut 34). For Moses to see the boundaries of the land of Canaan from the mountaintop was God’s grace; for him not to be allowed to enter in was God’s government.</div> <bR> <div> 4. David</div> <bR> <div> After David sinned, God was gracious and merciful to him in forgiving his sin. God even gave him special grace after the incident by permitting David to have unusual fellowship with Him. Yet the sword never left his house (II Samuel 12:7-14). This is God’s government.</div> <bR> <div> 5. Paul and Barnabas</div> <bR> <div> Paul and Barnabas separated from each other because of Mark (Acts 15:37-39). Mark was Barnabas’ relative (Colossians 4:10). He deserted Paul and Barnabas on their first missionary trip, but Barnabas was willing to take him again on the next trip. Clearly this was due to their relationship in the flesh. After Barnabas was separated from Paul, he took Mark to Cyprus, their native place, indicating that they worked together according to the fleshly relationship. Though it may be that Barnabas was still used of God and still did a good work, nevertheless the Holy Spirit took his name out of the Bible thereafter. No doubt his name is in the book of life, but it is no longer recorded in the book of Acts. This is God’s government. Under the government of God, man is not free to walk in his own way.</div> <div> Submission to God’s Government</div> <bR> <div> So the system of grace and the system of government are two separate matters.<FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#FF0000" FACE="Georgia" > The humbler a person is, the more he progresses in the governmental system. Never think that because you have entered into the system of God’s grace you can therefore escape the system of God’s government.</FONT></div> <bR> <div> Grace can never nullify government; rather, grace enables people to obey government. <FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#FF0000" FACE="Georgia" >May I say with all seriousness that grace gives us the strength to be subject to government. It does not make us rebellious or desirous of overthrowing government.</FONT> These systems complement each other. Grace never abolishes government. Only a fool would say that since he received grace, he can afford to be loose and careless. What a foolish thing that would be.</div> <bR> <div> The clearer a person understands grace, the better he will be as a servant or a master. The more a person knows grace, the better he is as a husband, a parent, a child, or a citizen, for he is more capable of submitting to authority. He who receives more of the grace of God knows more of how to maintain the government of God. I have yet to see one who truly knows God’s grace destroy God’s government.</div> <bR> <div> Head Covering and Government</div> <bR> <div> The matter of head covering belongs to God’s government. For those who do not know God’s government, it is impossible to exhort them to have their heads covered. They will not be able to understand how much is involved in this matter. But those who have seen God’s government in God’s revealed Word are able to appreciate the tremendous connection between head covering and God’s government. “Now I praise you in all things that you remember me in all things, and hold fast the traditions, even as I delivered them to you. But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God” (I Corinthians 11:2-3).</div> <bR> <div> The relationship here described is not that of the Father and the Son, but that of God and Christ. To use a modern expression, Christ is God’s representative. The relationship between the Father and Son pertains to the Godhead, but Christ sent of God touches upon God’s arrangement, God’s government. “And this is life eternal, that they should know thee the only true God, and Him whom Thou didst send, even Yahshua the Messiah” (John 17:3). God is God, and Christ is one sent by God. This is their relationship in God’s government. The Son, originally equal with God, was willing to be sent by God as the Christ. God remained on high as God, but Christ was sent down to do His work. This is the first order of events in the government of God.</div> <bR> <div> In God’s purpose, Christ is set up to be the head of every man; therefore, all people must obey Him. He is the firstborn of all creation and its firstfruit. He is the head of every man; every man should be in subjection to Him. This is a basic principle under God’s government. Christ being the head of every man is related, not to the system of grace, but to the system of God’s government. Likewise man being the head of woman also belongs to God’s governmental system. God in His government establishes man as head just as He sets up Christ as head and also Himself as head. Thus the system is completed.</div> <bR> <div> God is Himself the head; He sets up Christ as head; and he further establishes man to be head. These are the three great principles in God’s government.</div> <bR> <div> For God to be Christ’s head does not touch upon the matter of who is greater; rather it is simply an arrangement in the government of God. Likewise, under God’s government Christ is the head of every man and man is the head of woman. Such are God’s arrangements; such are His appointments.</div> <bR> <div> Philippians 2 is clear enough: the Lord Yahshua in His eternal essence is equal with God; but in God’s government He becomes Christ, and as Christ, God became His head. Christ Himself acknowledges in the Gospel of John that: “The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he sees the Father doing: for what things soever he does, these the Son does also in like manner” (John 6:38)... Today Christ takes His place in the government of God. According to God’s counsel, He is Christ and as Christ He needs to listen to God the Father, for God the Father and God the Son are equal in glory and honor in the Godhead, but in God’s government Christ does not stand in the place of God the Son; rather, He stands in the position of Christ, the One sent of God.</div> <bR> <div> Some day the whole world will know that Christ is the head of all men, for this is God’s governmental decision. Today this is known only in the church; the world has no knowledge of it. But the day will come when all the people of the world will recognize that Christ is the head. He will have the preeminence in all the creation. He is the firstborn of all creation and the firstfruit. Everyone must be in subjection to the authority of Christ. Likewise, God’s appointment of man as head of woman is also known only in the church today. Do you get the point? Today the church alone knows that Christ is the head of man and that man is the head of woman.</div> <bR> <div> We have already seen how grace can never overthrow God’s government. I trust our lesson will become clearer as we learn that grace is to support God’s government, not to destroy it. How can anyone be so foolish as to use grace to interfere with God’s government? The government of God is inviolable; His hand always sustains it. No one, just because he has believed in the Lord, can overthrow the Father’s authority, or even undermine the authority of any government. We must not say that because we are Christians we do not need to pay taxes. No, nothing of the sort! The better Christian you are, the more you maintain the government of God.</div> <bR> <div> We are here today to maintain God’s testimony in the world. God has shown us that there are three different heads: God is head, Christ is head, and man is head. This is not a matter of being brothers and sisters; it is basically a governmental arrangement. Grace is concerned with brothers and sisters, but government is different. God has sovereignly willed that the head of Christ is God Himself, so Christ must obey; the head of man is Christ, so man must obey; and the head of woman is man, and so woman should have the sign of obedience on her head.</div> <bR> <div> The Meaning of Head Covering</div> <bR> <div> “Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonors his head. But every woman praying or prophesying with her head unveiled dishonors her head; for it is one and the same things as if she were shaven” (I Corinthians 11:4-5).</div> <bR> <div> The meaning of head covering is: I submit myself to God’s government; I accept God’s appointed position; I dare not nullify His government by the grace I have received; I do not even dare think about it; on the contrary, I accept God’s government. <FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#FFFFCC" FACE="Georgia" >As Christ accepts God as His head, so should every man accept Christ as his head. Likewise, woman should representatively accept man as her head. In covering the head, the woman signifies that she is not head, that she is as if she has no head - for it is covered.</FONT></div> <bR> <div> Let us remember that although in practice it is only the woman who has her head covered, yet, in reality, Christ has His head covered before God and every man has his head covered before Christ. Why, then, is it that God only requires woman to have the practice of having her head covered? This indeed is marvelous, for it involves a very deep principle.</div> <bR> <div> I often feel that it is impossible to talk with some brothers and sisters about head covering because they have no knowledge of God’s government. Before anyone can understand head covering, he or she must first know God’s government. The whole question is settled once one sees that Christ has His head covered before God. How much more ought I to have my head covered before Him! I must cover it so that it is no longer seen or exposed, for Christ is my head. As a matter of fact, everyone’s head must be covered before God. Since Christ is my head, I cannot have my own head seen or exposed.</div> <bR> <div> Here I would like to tell Christian women that God has appointed man to be woman’s head. In these days when God’s authority is unknown in the world, the Lord demands this order only in the church. It therefore affects the very fact of our being Christians. God requires us in the church to accept what He has appointed governmentally.</div> <bR> <div> The Sister’s Responsibility</div> <bR> <div> When a sister covers her head, she is standing before God on the basis of Christ’s position before God and man’s position before Christ. God wants the woman to cover her head in order to manifest His government on earth. This privilege falls only to woman. She does not cover her head merely for her own self; she does it representatively. For her own self, she does it because she is a woman; representatively, it is because she represents man before Christ and Christ before God. So when woman covers her head before God, it is just the same as if Christ covered His head before God. Likewise, when woman covers her head before man, it is just the same as if man covered his head before Christ. Man or woman should have no head because Christ is head. If one’s head is not covered, there will be two heads. Between God and Christ one head must be covered; so too must it be between man and woman, and so between Christ and every man. If one head is not covered, the result will be that there are two heads. If God is head, then Christ is not; if Christ is head, then man is not; and if man is head, then woman is not.</div> <bR> <div> God calls upon the sisters to show this arrangement. It is through the sisters that God’s governmental system is to be displayed. It is the sisters who are responsible to have the sign of obedience on their heads. God specifically requires women to have their head covered when praying or prophesying. Why? Because they ought to know God’s government when they come before Him. In going before God to pray for people, or in going before people to prophesy for God, whether in praying or prophesying, whether in that which goes to God or in that which comes from God, in whatever is related to God, head covering is demanded. The purpose is to manifest the government of God.</div> <bR> <div> Man ought not to cover his head. It is a shame to his head if a man covers his head before woman, for the man represents Christ.</div> <bR> <div> How to Cover the Head</div> <bR> <div> “For if a woman is not veiled, let her also be shorn; but if it is a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be veiled” (I Corinthians 11:6). In other words, God tells the sisters to be thorough.</div> <bR> <div> No woman can keep her hair and not have her head covered. If she is not covered, she should have her hair either shorn or shaven. If she feels shameful to have her hair shorn or shaven, then she should be covered. Everything must be done thoroughly, not in half measure.</div> <bR> <div> “For a man ought not to have his head veiled, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man” (v.7). Since man represents the image and glory of God, he should not cover his head. But woman is the glory of man, so she should cover her head. If a woman does not cover her head, she cannot demonstrate that man is head. “For the man is not of the woman, but the woman of the man: for neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man” (vv. 8-9). These two verses make it very clear that the matter set before us is concerned with government. “For the man is not of the woman” - this is God’s doing. In God’s creation man did not come by woman, but woman from the rib of man. Hence, the head was Adam, not Eve. Furthermore, “neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.” Just by God’s ordering in creation, woman should be in submission to man.</div> <bR> <div> “For this cause ought a woman to have a sign of authority on her head, because of the angels” (v. 10). The Bible does not specify what is to be used for the covering; it only states that the head, where the hair grows, should be covered. Why should the head be covered? Because of the angels.</div> <bR> <div> I am often amazed at this marvelous teaching that sisters should have on their heads a sign of authority FOR THE SAKE OF THE ANGELS. We know the tragic history of how some of the angels sinned. Satan rebelled against God. Why? Because he desired to make himself equal with God. In other words, the angel Lucifer attempted to expose his own head before God and refused to submit to His authority. In Isaiah 14 Satan consistently reiterated “I will...” Right in this passage we see an archangel falling to become Satan. Revelation 12 further shows us that when Satan fell, one-third of the angelic host fell with him. Why did the angels fall? Because of their not being subject to the authority of God the head, but trying to expose their own heads.</div> <bR> <div> Today woman has a sign of authority on her head because of the angels, that is, as a testimony to the angels. Only the sisters in the church can testify to this, for the women of the world know nothing of it. Today when the sisters have the sign of authority on their heads, they bear the testimony that, “I have covered my head so that I do not have my own head, for I do not seek to be head. My head is veiled and I have accepted man as head, and to accept man as head means that I have accepted Christ as head and God as head. But some of you angels have rebelled against God.” This is what is meant by “because of the angels.”</div> <bR> <div> I have a sign of authority on my head. I am a woman with my head covered. This is a most excellent testimony to the angels, to the fallen and to the unfallen ones. No wonder Satan so persistently opposes the matter of head covering. It really puts him to shame. We are doing what he has failed to do. What God did not receive from the angels, He now has from the church. Because some of the angels do not submit themselves to the authority of God and of His Christ, the world is subject to great confusion. The fall of Satan has caused more trouble than the fall of man. But, thank God, what He failed to get from the fallen angels, He has obtained from the church.</div> <bR> <div> When many of the sisters in the church take the place given to woman and learn to cover their heads, they send out an unspoken word of testimony to the angels in the air, to the effect that God has obtained in the church what He desires. Because of this, woman must have on her head a sign of authority, a testimony to the angels.</div> <bR> <div> I have written all this out for you because I truly desire that you would see the truth of the magnificent testimony of head covering. It is tragic that the church has been falsely taught that the grace of God nullifies the government of God. This is great error and it will keep many from progressing in the kingdom. Only the truly humble will be able to receive this message, for pride always desires to uncover its head and determine its own way.</div> <bR> <div> Even as many women do not want to have any man directing their activities, so many men do not want Christ to dictate to them. Like Vashti, obedience is only followed when the will of Christ coincides with the will of man, or when the will of the wife or daughter coincides with the will of the husband or father. The world is full of two-headed monsters for many refuse to cover their head, desiring rather to expose it as Satan did.</div> <bR> <div> Is it any wonder that this is such a difficult teaching, since it bears upon the original transgression of Satan. He has worked tirelessly to get all others to uncover their heads, even as he did. He would have the whole world uncovered before God. We see the tragic results of his efforts as children uncover their heads before their parents, wives before their husbands, men before Christ, servants before their masters, citizens before their governmental leaders. The world, and especially the church, has become the target of Satan’s deceptions until it is full of it.</div> <bR> <div> The scriptures actually foretell that this would be the condition of Christianity before the return of Yahshua, for in Thessalonians we are told that He would in no wise return unless the apostasy occurred first, the great falling away from the truth. We are told that God would send the church strong delusion for they did not love the truth. Paul said that the last days would be difficult days for men would heap to themselves teachers to tickle their ears and they would not endure sound doctrine. So many proclaim that we live in the last days, but they are heedless that the scriptures say that this would be the state of Christianity before the return of Yahshua.</div> <bR> <div> Should we not expect that the understanding of God’s government would be hidden and greatly obscured in this day? Should we not expect that many would even tragically use the grace of God as an excuse to tear down and reject the government of God? What harm these ones do to themselves and all those around them. They will not make further progress in the kingdom.</div> <bR> <div> Is it not telling that it takes humility to receive this teaching, yet that the casting off of this teaching is in harmony with the pride of man that seeks to yield to no other authority? All of these things should be witnesses to the truth and they should expose where the true error lies.</div> <bR> <div> It took humility for me to go back to the church Father sent me to and to submit myself to leadership that was in sin. It took humility to begin to intercede for them and to seek to cover their sin, rather than to have it broadcast and exposed. It also takes faith to believe that Yahweh will deal with the authority that is in sin, without our intervention, and without us contending with them.</div> <bR> <div> I do not speak this to say that I am some humble man who is great in faith, but to bear testimony that although I am a man, I too have had to cover my head. I can encourage women to do the same for I have walked in it, and continue to do so. I seek always to have my head covered before Christ and to not expose it. Let there only be one head between me and Him, and let that be His head.</div> <bR> <div> Some when they hear this teaching think that it sounds strict and legalistic. They have confused government with legalism. When Yahshua walked in perfect submission to the Father, having no will or initiative of His own, it was not legalism He was under, but He was perfectly submitted to the government of God. This led to a perfect peace between He and the Father. There was no striving. Likewise when women cover their heads, literally and practically, peace is the result in households everywhere. When they uncover their heads striving is the result. This is certainly the witness of I Peter 3.</div> <bR> <div> In I Peter 3 we also are given Sarah as an example of a godly and submissive wife, and immediately afterward the great obstacle to following in her example is listed. The obstacle is fear. Many women fear that if they submit to their husbands and they do not correct them when they are wrong, if they do not constantly make known their own desires and need before their husbands, they will somehow be neglected, abused, or suffer in some way. It takes faith in God to overcome these fears and to place ones trust in Yahweh. It takes faith to remain silent and to trust that Yahweh will correct a husband who is disobedient to the word. Sadly, too many women exercise fear rather than faith, and the sad results are seen in the church and in our society.</div> <bR> <div> The same is certainly true of men who are afraid to trust Christ and to follow Him wherever He leads. Many refuse to let go of the reins of their lives. They fear that Christ might lead them down paths that are terrifying to them. They are afraid that somehow their own needs and desires will be overlooked or neglected. They respond out of fear and uncover their heads. Like Vashti, multitudes of men only obey Christ when His commands coincide with their will. These sadly will not be chosen to be a part of the Bride of Christ. Their position will be given to another who is more worthy.</div> <bR> <div> We all need grace to walk in these things, tremendous grace. This life is fraught with perils, and we need the comfort ad assurance of a Savior who loves us enough to lay down His life for us.</div> <bR> <div> I told you that my life changed irrevocably when I learned these truths and began t walk in them. Peace was the very first fruit that attended this understanding of government and submission. I had peace in my life that I lacked in prior days. I knew what was expected of me, and though I have been led through the valley of the shadow of death, I have clung to my Lord and Savior and followed Him where He led me. He has preserved me and brought me into much truth in the last eight years, truths that would have been withheld from me had I not accepted His government, rather than resisting it.</div> <bR> <div> When we enter into the place of submission and humility, this finds great favor with God. He knows our frame and our weaknesses. It finds great favor with Him when He sees us following the path of submission despite all of the fears and objections that arise within us. The word He gave me concerning those who obeyed Him in following this course is: “The eyes of Yahweh roam to and fro throughout the earth, that He might strongly support those whose hearts are wholly His.” When He finds such a one, He will move heaven and earth on their behalf. How beautiful is a submissive and trusting heart in His sight. His heart is captivated by the sight of such a one. With longing He desires to reach out and support those who have adorned themselves with a quiet and submissive spirit.</div> <bR> <div> I hope this has spoken to you in some ways. These are the most profound truths of any that exist in the kingdom of God. I have found no others that were so powerful and transforming. May these truths become yours, and may you have great grace to walk in them.</div> <bR> <div> In Yahshua,</div> <bR> <div> Joseph Herrin</div> <bR> <bR> </td> </tr></table></body>